Good question isn't it? Which one would you choose? While you decide keep in mind that you can only choose one. Not so easy isn't it? Try thinking harder. Being free, living your life the way you want it to or are you willing to give up some of your freedom for a false sense of security?I'm from a country which has a rich communist past but I tell you these new measures of "security" taken around the world in the last years, especially in the US, are quite disturbing from my point of view.Take the Patriot Act for example. It increases the ability of law enforcement agencies to search telephone, e-mail communications, medical, financial and other records, it eases restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States; expands the Secretary of Treasury's authority to regulate financial transactions, particularly those involving foreign individuals and entries; and enhances the discretion of law enforcement and immigration authorities in detaining and deporting immigrants suspected of terrorism-related acts. This act also expands the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism, thus enlarging the number of activities to which the US
Patriot Act's expanded law enforcement powers can be applied.
In more simple words, if you have an argument with your neighbour for example, and he announces the authorities that you are a terrorist (your neighbour acting in revenge), your house can be searched without a warrant, the authorities can make a copy of your hard drive, they can wiretap your phone and so on. They can do all of this because someone suspected you of terrorism! This reminds me of the methods used by the Gestapo in Nazi Germany, the KGB in Russia, and Securitatea in my home country back in the communist days.I understand the fact that a country without some sort of security is a dead one but isn't this to much? With the introduction of the biometric visas, the biometric drivers license system, biometric passports and the biometric microchip we (the average citizens) are monitored like cattle. Furthermore these technologies are not full prof. With the right amount of time and technological skill these security measures can be hacked. Trust me. Just google it, the brilliant minds of the members of 2600 and Defcon (and probably other hacker communities as well) can explain it better than I do.
Now if we pretend that they are full prof these methods of security raise other questions. If everything is biometrically controlled then how will the CIA for example will conduct future operations? After all if everything it's biometrically controlled, there is no place to run and no place to hide because everything is monitored. And furthermore what about ethics?
So what about you? I ask you again: What would you choose? Freedom or Security?